|
Aux
Posts: 91
|
 |
« Reply #220 on: 19 Jan '05 - 12:01 » |
Quote
|
Well, I have one little wish. Can You please add a new action to keyboard shortcuts which will display popup with current song title like one which popups when songs change. That will be VERY useful I think. For me (: Thanks a lot.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Aux
Posts: 91
|
 |
« Reply #221 on: 19 Jan '05 - 12:06 » |
Quote
|
And another question - may I become a beta-tester? (: I would really appreciate if You give me a chance to see something new before everybody else (:
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Ian @ un4seen
Administrator
Posts: 15269
|
 |
« Reply #222 on: 20 Jan '05 - 18:44 » |
Quote
|
As it happens, there are some fundamental changes in 3.2, so it could probably do with a few more testers. But you've got to ask yourself, "am I willing to hunt for bugs until my eyes/ears start bleeding?". If so, you may have what it takes to become a beta-tester 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Knurek
Posts: 499
|
 |
« Reply #223 on: 20 Jan '05 - 21:10 » |
Quote
|
As it happens, there are some fundamental changes in 3.2, so it could probably do with a few more testers. But you've got to ask yourself, "am I willing to hunt for bugs until my eyes/ears start bleeding?". If so, you may have what it takes to become a beta-tester  Which reminds me that I should get back to my module crash tests (14 GB to go, gonna take a *long* time  ).
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Kyle
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #224 on: 21 Jan '05 - 00:07 » |
Quote
|
I'd like to beta test, through WINE under linux that is. Maybe 3.2, with the fundamental changes initiated, will run more smoothly. Maybe not, i'd like to give it a shot.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Aux
Posts: 91
|
 |
« Reply #225 on: 21 Jan '05 - 08:55 » |
Quote
|
Well, I'm submiting bugs about 2-3 times per month to Opera Software for their browser. I think I can handle XMPlay too (:
You can write to me to aux /at/ liqu.id.lv since I check my profile e-mail rarely.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Knurek
Posts: 499
|
 |
« Reply #226 on: 21 Jan '05 - 10:00 » |
Quote
|
I'd like to beta test, through WINE under linux that is. Maybe 3.2, with the fundamental changes initiated, will run more smoothly. Maybe not, i'd like to give it a shot.
Would be really good if XMPlay would work fine under WINE. I'm planning full switch to linux later this year, and XMPlay is the only thing that is keeping me in the Windows platform. :|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Ian @ un4seen
Administrator
Posts: 15269
|
 |
« Reply #227 on: 21 Jan '05 - 13:55 » |
Quote
|
I'd like to beta test, through WINE under linux that is. Maybe 3.2, with the fundamental changes initiated, will run more smoothly. Maybe not, i'd like to give it a shot. The changes aren't GUI related, so I don't think it's likely to make any difference to WINE. But I'll send the beta to Knurek to test with his MODs, and he can check that too 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Roj
Posts: 424
|
 |
« Reply #228 on: 21 Jan '05 - 20:11 » |
Quote
|
I'd like to beta test, through WINE under linux that is. Maybe 3.2, with the fundamental changes initiated, will run more smoothly. Maybe not, i'd like to give it a shot. The changes aren't GUI related, so I don't think it's likely to make any difference to WINE. But I'll send the beta to Knurek to test with his MODs, and he can check that too  Can you give us a brief thumbnail of what 3.2 has in store?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Kyle
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #229 on: 23 Jan '05 - 07:27 » |
Quote
|
"The changes aren't GUI related, so I don't think it's likely to make any difference to WINE."
I'm getting a segmentation fault at the start of the program, that for some stupid reason, WINE won't give any debug info on. So all I get is "Segmentation Fault" and poof, it bombs. I.e. I can't tell weather it's a problem with the GUI, or the code.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Knurek
Posts: 499
|
 |
« Reply #230 on: 23 Jan '05 - 08:46 » |
Quote
|
I'm getting a segmentation fault at the start of the program, that for some stupid reason, WINE won't give any debug info on. So all I get is "Segmentation Fault" and poof, it bombs. I.e. I can't tell weather it's a problem with the GUI, or the code.
I got more. Not much, but it's a start (hopefully). "Unhandled exception (thread 0009) err:seh:setup_exception nested exception on signal stack in thread 0009 eip 401c879a esp 40031cb8 stack 0x40590000-0x40690000" This is constant. Running xmplay.exe -tray doesn't change it.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: 23 Jan '05 - 09:23 by Knurek »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Ian @ un4seen
Administrator
Posts: 15269
|
 |
« Reply #231 on: 23 Jan '05 - 18:33 » |
Quote
|
Can you give us a brief thumbnail of what 3.2 has in store? Won't that ruin the surprise? Downloading a new version should be like Christmas morning - hoping for something great, but sometimes getting socks  I'm getting a segmentation fault at the start of the program, that for some stupid reason, WINE won't give any debug info on. So all I get is "Segmentation Fault" and poof, it bombs. I.e. I can't tell weather it's a problem with the GUI, or the code. Strange. I remember when I tried it before, the GUI was messed up (side panels not where they should be), but it didn't crash. I guess I'll have to give it another go.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Kyle
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #232 on: 23 Jan '05 - 18:49 » |
Quote
|
Thanks Knurek! And it is strange...I'm using the latest official release of WINE off sourceforge, so that may be what it is. We'll see.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
chuchu
Posts: 12
|
 |
« Reply #233 on: 2 Feb '05 - 11:11 » |
Quote
|
Use own plug-in architechture, forget the winamp plug-in nightmare/problem forever 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Zarggg
Posts: 1239
|
 |
« Reply #234 on: 2 Feb '05 - 17:41 » |
Quote
|
Use own plug-in architechture, forget the winamp plug-in nightmare/problem forever  Oh, hell no. This would require nearly all plugins for non-native file formats to be recoded for XMPlay's own plugin system, and I seriously doubt the authors would want to do that. That's a sure-fire way to kill XMPlay.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Tsorovan
Posts: 1244
|
 |
« Reply #235 on: 2 Feb '05 - 17:47 » |
Quote
|
Nightmare/problem? How?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Roj
Posts: 424
|
 |
« Reply #236 on: 2 Feb '05 - 18:36 » |
Quote
|
Use own plug-in architechture, forget the winamp plug-in nightmare/problem forever  Oh, hell no. This would require nearly all plugins for non-native file formats to be recoded for XMPlay's own plugin system, and I seriously doubt the authors would want to do that. That's a sure-fire way to kill XMPlay. Is there a BASS plugin for Winamp? Just curious...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
chuchu
Posts: 12
|
 |
« Reply #238 on: 3 Feb '05 - 10:56 » |
Quote
|
Nightmare/problem? How?
The winamp5 plugins have many problem  forturnately xmplay doesn't use the winamp's wma,vorbis plugins,both of them create more problems  xmplay itself doesn't support MP4 container, so using the winamp plugins is a bad idea(this pligins can't recognize MP2/3-in-mp4).
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Knurek
Posts: 499
|
 |
« Reply #239 on: 3 Feb '05 - 12:00 » |
Quote
|
The winamp5 plugins have many problem  If you don't like them, don't use them. Simple as that. If/When the native plugin system gonna be added, you'll be free to write your own ones. Or still use the old ones, whatever floats your boat.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|